| About Necofa | General Acitivities | Projects | National Network Groups | Picture Gallery | Services | Contact & Imprint |
![]() |
Vol. 9, No. 4 |
TROPENTAG 2007:
An Inspiring Experience For Africa and Necofa
By:
Samuel K. Muhunyu
Network For Ecofarming In
Africa (Necofa) Kenya.
P.O Box 819 Molo.
20106 Kenya
Tel. +254(051) 721048
Cell: +254 (722 647112
Email: necofakenya@yahoo.com
Website: www.necofa.org. / www.necofakenya.wordpress.com
INTRODUCTION
Tropentag is an international conference for Research on Food Security, Natural Resources Management and Rural Development. It started in 1999 and is held alternately by German Universities in collaboration with other German Organizations/Institutions engaged in Agriculture and Forestry in tropical countries. The event provides international platform for scientific exchange and interaction between students, scientists and development agents.
Tropentag 2007 was organized jointly by the Universities of Kassel and Gottigen and the theme was:- Utilization of diversity in land use systems: Sustainable and organic approaches to meet human needs” The event was held at the University of Kassel 9th-11th October, 2007 with several workshops and activities broken down in five broad subjects i.e. Resources use efficiency and diversity in agro ecosystems; Towards the Millenium development goals; innovation and adoption in agriculture and forestry; Diversity of land use and livelihood systems in the face of Global change; Ecosystem services in forest and agrarian landscapes; Current advances in analysis and modeling techniques and food production, food quality and food safety.
I was invited to participate in the event to make poster presentation on “NECOFA Kenya initiative to inculcate positive attitudes in the youth towards sustainable management of food Agriculture and environment” that I co-presented with Dr. Sahle Tesfai the international coordinator of necofa.
After the event, I participated in a meeting for Network for Ecofarming in Africa (NECOFA) that included representatives from Sudan, Uganda, Kenya, Ethiopia, Cameroon, and Zambia. The meeting was chaired by the International Coordinator of NECOFA, Dr. Tesfai and graced with the presence of Mr. Hatmut Gast of InWEnt. After the meeting the Necofa team from Africa visited a company specializing in renewable energy (especially solar and wind) and a coffee roaster.
My involvement in the visit to Germany and participation in the inspiring events /activities was facilitated by the International Coordinator of Necofa, Dr. Sahle Tesfai and supported by Capacity Building International (InWEnt.). I therefore wish to register my appreciation and gratude to InWEnt for according me opportunity to participate in these events and activities
.
EXPERIENCE IN TROPENTAG
The lessons learned from the workshops that I participated in include:
a) Workshop on “ Livestock and fodder production systems”
Integrating green manure crops that provide animal fodder is a major intervention in soil fertility management, weed control food and nutrition security. Such intervention was carried out in Uganda and resulted in increased yields of milk for small-holder resource poor farmers in which they introduced lablab bean and nappier in forage.
However while the results were good and encouraging it was noted that testing legume/fodder technologies with resource poor farmers is a big challenge because of their low literacy levels and limited exposure and it requires patience and institutional support. On the other hand it is quite positive since they end up owning the process / technology and the level of adoption is high.
Integrating traditional systems of livestock management especially on fodder management with scientific research interventions in most cases have better results than either of them done independently. The experience of the community especially in handling times of scarcity like feeding livestock during dry spells is very important. This is recommendation and experience from Ethiopia where the scientists evaluated coping strategies for dairy farmers during dry period feeding and its relative effects on milk (and its derivatives) outputs.
Workshop on “Determinants of technology adoption and implementations for policy and program design”.
· Adoption of organic farming technologies, especially on soil fertility enhancement, is dependent on several factors that include farmers’ perceptions, access or otherwise to credit facilities, on-farm and/or off-farm income sources and availability of extension services including farmer-to-farmer. These were part of findings by a project in North Guinea, The balanced nutrient management systems (BNMS).
· While fish is unavailable and/or unaffordable in most of sub-Saharan Africa, potential for fish farming abounds and there are sufficient wetlands on which to do it. Farmers and community perception and attitude contribute to reduced level of adoption and avenues need to be identified for overcoming such barriers. There is also need to develop country/community specific strategies for the promotion of this technology to make fish available and affordable to the community.
Workshop on: “Sustainable development in practice-examples from GTZ’s project”
Ø In its endeavor to promote sustainable development, German Development Cooperation interprates sustainable development as:-
§ Supporting sustainable economic growth in partner countries, in order to alleviate poverty and disparity (pro poor growth)
§ Ensuring equality of opportunity, between rich and poor, North and South, women and men
§ Utilizing natural resources for the benefit of humanity today such that they are preserved for future generations.
§ Sustainable solutions to complex development questions are not available off the rack. This is why a mix of different types of interventions is used, including policy advisory services, technical and organizational consultancy, and financing. German development cooperation operates with civil society, private sector, the population and other bilateral and international donors.
Ø Sustainability has three dimensions ecological, economic and social that are intertwined and has international perspective. In combating poverty, all three dimensions of sustainability have to be taken into account i.e. conservation of sound environment for future generations; global economic partnership to overcome dissemination between poor and rich countries; improving the social welfare of people especially on food and nutrition, health especially on food nutrition, health especially HIV/AIDS, malaria or tuberculosis.
Sustainet, a “light house project” of the German Council for Sustainable Development in its efforts to contribute to the global challenges of combating poverty and assuring food security in rural areas focuses on:-
o Creating awareness on errors in the so-called “Green Revolution.” It highlights the misconception that Green Revolution can solve problems of food insecurity but has in fact only succeeded in contributing to the impoverishment of small farmers by trapping them in debt.
o Enlightening communities on the danger posed by “Green gene” technology that is being promoted by transnational companies as “only-way” to abolish hunger.
NB/
After this wonderful presentation, Mr H. Gast of InWEnt took trouble to introduce the Necofa Kenya delegate to officials of Sustainet and its likely that Necofa Kenya will be integrated in the programme.
Workshop on “Research for development practitioners”
The Kenyan delegate presented a poster on “Necofa Kenya initiative to inculcate positive attitudes in the youth towards Sustainable Management of food, agriculture and environment.” The presentation dwelt on the experiences of Necofa Kenya with school garden projects in which the youth:-
v Gain hands-on experience in organic food production and utilization
v Multiply/bulk planting materials for the community
v provide training/demonstration for fellow students, teachers and communities
v Gain leadership and computer/internet skills.
By working with my colleagues and others who have had more experiences in
posters making and presentation, I gained additional knowledge and skills in this.
NECOFA MEETING.
In the meeting the delegates from each country provided update/report on Necofa activities in their countries. I was quite impressed with success of the Ethiopian chapter to market organic coffee and the stages they had gone through. The Kenyan success in school gardens, marketing of Stinging Nettle (Urtica massaica) and Molo Lamb and wool projects were reported in the meeting.
Mr. Gast of InWEnt explained that the agreement between InWEnt and Necofa at international level will end soon and emphasized need to explore avenues for sustainability of the organization. The need for venturing into income generating activities as means of sustainability at national and international levels was once again agreed on and emphasized.
The meeting further agreed that neighbouring country chapters should forge collaboration and partnership and build on their synergies. The cooperation in East Africa (Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania) was sited as practical example of how the country chapters can benefit from one another. The three states have held common training workshops and exchange visits for farmers, teachers and community leaders. One such exchange visit will take place 2nd- 8th December in which 30 people (farmers, school garden teachers and Necofa staff) from Kenya will visit Uganda.
To enhance and strategize better on such collaboration and partnership; it was agreed that each region of Africa propose a meeting for Necofa chapter leaders in neighbouring countries early in 2008. For East Africa we intend to include representatives from Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda, Zambia and Burundi all of whom can travel by road or rail to meeting venue. InWEnt will be approached to support the meetings but the concepts need to be submitted before end of the year.
VISITS AFTER TROPENTAG
(a) Solar 23 and SMA Technologies
Solar 23 specializes in manufacture of converters for energy from renewable sources e.g. sun, wind, batteries and even grid. It works closely with SMA Technologies that markets equipments and appliances world-wide including Africa.
Most rural areas in Africa are faced with challenges of power supply since the national grids are either far off or unaffordable. The technologies presented during the visit are possible interventions for such problem and can actually trigger more sustainable growth and community development in the rural areas. Necofa country chapters can even venture into marketing of such technology and equipment for both community development and own sustainability. Some limitations though, include the fact that the companies are focusing on just a few countries (Kenya not included at least for time being) in Africa and the fact that for economics of scale it is important to sensitize a village and/or community rather than individual households.
(b) Coffee Roasting.
We enjoyed an early morning train ride through rich country-side that took us
to a coffee roasting company. The proprietor led us through the process of coffee roasting and the different products the company comes up with. We also learned how they source their coffee though little is from Africa. They don’t have “lines” for organic coffee yet, but the potential for the same is great.
There is also potential for marketing Kenyan and Ethiopian coffee to the company but it requires elaborate organization and discussion. It is yet another window for Necofa to venture in and benefit the farmers as well as enhancing its own sustainability and relevance in community development.
OTHER DELIBERATIONS
Before leaving Germany I learned that nettle (Urticacea) and Kenyan neem infusions have found their way into market in the German market. Necofa Kenya is already working with community groups on production, sustainable harvesting and marketing of nettle powder is Kenya since 2005. Currently we handle about tones of dry powder annually. Neem trees are quite abundant on the Kenya coast. This is opportunity for Necofa Kenya that we will definitely follow up (not just for Germany but for other export market as well).
CONCLUSION
Once again I reiterate my gratitude to InWEnt and the International Coordinator for Necofa for granting me opportunity to participate in the visitation.
___________________________________________________________________________
A Report on International Conference – Tropentag 2007
By Asfaw Tihune
NECOFA – Ethiopia
Introduction
NECOFA – Ethiopia is an Ethiopian chapter of NECOFA International established in 1998 and sponsored by InWent. Initially operating as a professional association, the Network made a strategic change since the Kumasi Manifesto and currently engaged in the promotion of marketing of eco- products. In cooperation with Agricultural Output marketing Agency of Oromiyaa, a government institution of the largest Regional Government of Ethiopia, NECOFA – Ethiopia is coordinating and organizing 3864 smallholder coffee producers to convert their coffee farm in to organics. Accordingly, funding for a one-year pilot project was obtained from Oxfam GB and farmers organized under 146 Organic Coffee Market Groups are organically certified.
NECOFA – Ethiopia participated on Tropentag 2007 with two objectives. The first two of its members have to present posters on the occasion. Asfaw Tihune presented a case study poster on the topic “Organic coffee Production and sustainable agriculture” while Abera Tolera on “Influence of small scale irrigationo selected soil chemical properties”.
Second, a delegation of four members has to promote organic coffee from the project area. InWent sponsored the presenters of posters. The Limmuu Organic Coffee Initiative Project sponsored the other two participants – a private company and a government representative. Overall four NECOFA members participated on the Conference from Ethiopia.
The Conference
Tropentag 2007 was organized under the main title “Utilization of diversity in land use systems: Sustainable and organic approaches to meet human needs”. The title is divided in to six themes each of which is sub-divided in to five topics. Totally 23 oral presentations were conducted in plenary sessions. The conference organized 27 parallel guided poster sessions divided into 308 topics. There were about three pre-conference occasions, social evening, candle lighting ceremony and other programs conducted with relation to the conference. The plenary session under the title “Challenges and opportunities for development oriented research in the tropics”, which gave due emphasis to strengthening of development related research in the tropics and made a call to the Developed world and donors was the closing session of the conference.
Observations and Experiences
As expected, the conference is one of the international forums on which experts all over the world could physically and spiritual meet and exchange experiences. The book of abstracts reads that more than 650 people from 68 countries have registered to participate on the conference. It merits the name a Global/International forum.
The focus of all the presentations bases on tropical agriculture, which shows the global concern for the smallholder farmers of the tropics. Research out puts and development project experiences with relevance to the socio-ecological life of rural people of the tropics attained focal discussion on the conference. Presentations and discussions covered all areas from production up to marketing, all issues and activities in between not over-jumped.
The conference, along with other issues, explicitly fostered that smallholder farmers of the tropics can achieve food security if they are able to utilize their competitive advantage of producing and marketing organic commodities. It is important for NECOFA – Ethiopia to participate on this conference and recognize that it is on a correct track of promoting organic/sustainable agriculture, and focus on marketing of these products.
Side by side with participation on the conference, promotion of Limmuu organic coffee took place. Contacts were made with roasters and importers. The delegates came to consensus with some of them to enter into marketing in the near future. Successful visit to Hagen Kafe is a good example of the mission.
The most fruitful and tangible achievement of this trip is the agreement obtained between NECOFA, Farm Organic International and SMA. Accordingly, SMA mandated the former two bodies to distribute its products in Ethiopia as its legal representatives.
With relevance to this advantage, both InWent who sponsored NECOFA-Ethiopia to participate on the Conference and NECOFA- International who facilitated conditions deserve due respect.
It is difficult, for me personally, to compare this conference with previous Tropentag conferences, since it is my first time to participate. Yet, the general coordination of the conference, especially at the opening ceremony, seems to be not well coordinated.
NECOFA – Ethiopia, on behalf of thousands of its farmer members, forwards its thanks to InWent for enabling the country network to exploit this occasion and also expects similar cooperation.
Report on Tropentag 2007; Utilisation of diversity in land use systems; Sustatinable and organic approaches to meet human needs.
By Peter Lusembo
The above conference was organised by the Universities of Kassel and Gottingen and held in Witzenhausen, 9-11 October, 2007.
Organisation
The Tropentag was supported by a number of Germany organisations, an indication of the excellent work done by the organisers to lobby for support. This did also depict the importance that the Germany society attaches to the outcome of Tropentag 2007 as a means of contributing to improving livelihood in the tropics and sub-tropics. Though the event was originally intended to provide fora for Tropical Agricultural practitioners to present research findings, Tropentag had evolved into a system for interaction of all stakeholders in agricultural development. This was evidenced by the cross section of people from all walks of life who attended Tropentag 20007.
Opening Session
In the opening plenary keynote presentation (The science of sustainable agriculture) it was emphasized that processes of adopting and adapting technologies in different areas, were as important as generating technologies themselves. Failure to adapt technologies was responsible for the many technologies that had remained on-the-shelf, since their generation. Free Trade Agreements were cited as not being favourable to the development of commercial farming by smallholder farmers in the tropics, because it exposes them to stiff competition from farmers in the developed countries. Implementation of the Agreements was also reported not to enhance crop bio-diversity. Although 90% of World Agriculture is devoted to monocrops, there is growing realisation of the importance of mixed cropping as a means towards maintaining crop bio-diversity and minimizing adverse effects associated with monocultures.
Selected Follow-up sessions
Organic agriculture
Organic agricultural production in a number of developing countries appears not to work for sustainability of the natural resources but is geared towards meeting the needs of the affluent, especially in the developed countries. In the discussions it also emerged that it would be vital if the Developed Countries made significant contribution to sustaining bio-diversity in developing countries. Sustainable agriculture tends to be expensive because usually yields from there are low yet developing countries are not yet able to go in for quality when they can hardly feed themselves. The other aspect that necessitates the intervention of developed countries is that global weather changes would affect all humanity irrespective of location on the globe.
Agroforestry and non-tree forest products
During this session I was greatly impressed by Benno Pokorny’s presentation that put the universal benefits of the Green Revolution to a balance, especially in regard to typically rural communities that cant afford to use high levels of inputs that are required to maximize benefits from varieties (Dwarf varieties of rice and maize) that were pivotal in the Green Revolution.
Research for development practitioners
The session touched on issues that have immediate application to the needs of smallholder farmers. Presentations and discussions highlighted the importance of all stakeholders playing a vital role in improving livelihood by enabling developed technologies to be used by intended beneficiaries. It also put emphasis on the need to make use of practices that have been used by certain communities over time and have proved to work. Members tended to agree to the suggestion that it is important to fully appreciate the processes that work, because, unlike practices that are usually site specific, processes can easily be scaled up. Traditional systems/practices can only work in static environments but we are in a constantly changing world, hence the need to keep modifying practices to fit the changing circumstances. My poster presentation under this session was well received as it provided possible links among R&D actors
Awards
The awarding ceremony of the Hans H Ruthenberg laureates (Ms Blen Beyene and Xenia Felice Van Edig) who worked on Traditional Leafy Vegetables for adaptation to stress and measurement of absolute poverty indicators among rural households, respectively, was inspiring. This posed a challenge to countries in the Developing World, which could adopt the approach for their staff, using and operating within available resources. A number of us resolved to adopt the approach and recognise selected staff working in our institutions, when they excel in their research endeavours.
NECOFA meeting
We had a meeting of all NECOFA members who either attended Tropentag 2007 or happened to be in Germany during the event. Members were reminded of the fact that the Network Secretariat is to provide minimal financial facilitation to member countries, which have to shoulder responsibility to move the network forward. The Coordination office of the Network would best be used to support applications soliciting for funds to implement NECOFA activities within member countries. The meeting agreed that there was need for regional groupings of the network in order to enhance cohesiveness of members. Hence, members from the East African region (including Zambia), proposed to meet early 2008 to develop a Strategic Plan that should be used in the next 5 years or so. The Secretariat promised to look for financial support for the event.
Post Tropentag activities
Thanks to Dr. Tesfai for organising visits to two organisations that are of direct relevance to the needs of smallholder farmers, especially in Africa.
SMA and Solar 23.
These organisations specialise in making inverters and solar panels. I was glad to learn that Solar 23 has a subsidiary in Uganda (UtraTec Ltd) that is already providing Solar Water Heaters to a number of rural communities in the country. The use of solar energy in a country like Uganda, which partly depends on oil to generate its electricity, is of paramount importance if the country has to stem its import bill for oil.
Coffee Roasters
The establishment that roasts coffee was impressive where the Managing Director did practically know and every operation in the process of roasting and blending coffee procured from different parts of the World. We had high expectations for our colleagues from Ethiopia to clinch deals to export their organic coffee direct to this Coffee Roasting establishment. It was rather disappointing to learn that even if their coffee beans were of the highest quality it was not possible for them to export it to the company because it deals with established Cartels through which all their coffee imports must go through. However, this was a great opportunity to initiate contacts that can be developed further for future prospects.
Acknowledgement
I acknowledge the support of InWent that enabled me attend this important function which particularly benefited me through the numerous contacts I made with Tropentag 2007 delegates and those I met out of the event. This support would not have materialised if it were not for Dr. Tesfai and Mr. Gast. Madam Baumann is also acknowledged for her role when Mr. Gast was on leave. I would also like to thank NECOFA members who attended the event and also those many people I interacted with directly or through their presentations.
What is New in Agricultural Research?
- A Critical Review of the Tropentag 2007
in Witzenhausen
By HARTMUT GAST
Since 1996, the Centres for Agriculture in the Topics and Subtropics of the universities Hohenheim, Göttingen and the Humboldt University of Berlin are organizing a yearly conference called "Tropentag" to present and discuss recent findings of research in agriculture and rural development. Since than, other universities like the University of Kassel-Witzenhausen have joint in and the number of visitors, papers and posters presented has more than doubled. This time, about 600 scientists and some few practitioners from 72 countries gathered together in Witzenhausen, among them more than 100 scientists from developing countries, mostly sponsored by DAAD, but also by GTZ and InWEnt.
It was hard for most visitors to follow an unbroken threat according to own priorities, as the 129 papers and 310 posters presented were colourful and sometimes arbitrary put together in 29 thematic sessions, 6 sessions each at the same time. May be this was also a result of the conference title "Utilization of diversity in land use systems: Sustainable and organic approaches to meet human needs". The presentations were really diverse and there was no topic left out which moves the minds and hearts of agricultural researchers during the last two decades. It was hard to find out what is really new in agricultural research, and to detect some really practical findings that will help farmers and the rural poor to solve major problems.
Some good examples were presented, for .example a paper describing prevention methods how to safe the health of urban population in West Africa consuming vegetable grown under completely untreated waste water. As these communities cannot yet afford and maintain safe sewage plants, agronomists had to find a solution. More creatiove research based on urgent human needs is required.
As outsider of the research society it is hard to understand why the major challenge, the climate change, which will tremendously affect agricultural production in the tropics and subtropics during the next decades, just played a minor or nearly no role in the conference.
The climate change will force us to change complete production systems, to develop more resistant varieties against various evils, to observe and monitor changing ecosystems, and to develop different strategies in plant protection. Some contributions presented serve already this need, however, a strategy of the role of agricultural research how to overcome the challenge, is badly missing. In order to develop in time options and solutions for plant and animal production under changing climatic conditions, an improved and closer cooperation of agronomists with meteorologists and geographers is essential.
Agricultural research should contribute to sustainability with regard to food supply, environment and human needs. The fist day, a panel discussed the topic "Quantitative indicators of sustainability in land use systems". Unfortunately there was no result. The panellists and the audience agreed that indicators for unsustainability in land use can be found, but not for sustainability. The views and priorities of the different stake holders - producers, companies, politicians and the society as a whole - differ just too much.
It is a pity that the panellists and the audience did not consider better the key note address of Prof. Dr. Miguel Altieri from the University of California, who draw a clear vision of a sustainable agricultural development. He derived the current needs of agricultural research out of his view as long-term observer and guide of traditional small-scale farmers applying sustainable or organic production systems. He quoted that traditional farmers in Central America who practice a highly diversified system, were far less affected by the hurricane Mitch than conventional "modern" farmers. To overcome the challenges of climate change, we should learn more from these diversity farmers, he said. Prof. Altieri pledged to work closer with the farmers, to learn and to cooperate with them and to ask them which kind of support they need.
At the end of the conference, good news was spread. Representatives of the donors, amongst them DFG, DAAD, GTZ and Volkswagen Foundation, mentioned that funds designated to agricultural research may rise in future. This is very much needed - if used in the right way.
Hartmut Gast
InWEnt
Div. Rural Development, Food and Consumer Protection
___________________________________________________________________
NECOFA Presentation during
Deutscher Tropentag, October 9 - 11, 2007 in Witzenhausen
"Utilisation of diversity in land use systems:
Sustainable and organic approaches to meet human needs"
NECOFA KENYA INITIATIVE IN INCULCATING POSITIVE ATTITUDES IN THE YOUTH TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF FOOD, AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT.
by:
Mr. Samuel Muhunyu – Network for Ecofarming in Africa (NECOFA) Kenya
and
Dr. Sahle Tesfai – International Centre North South Dialogue (ICNSD),
NECOFA International Coordinator.
During:
Tropentag October 9-11, 2007 Witzenhausen – Germany
Network for Ecofarming in Africa (NECOFA) is a community based non-governmental organization promoting Ecofarming: Ecologically and Socially Sustainable Land Management. NECOFA was founded in 1998 in Addis Ababa – Ethiopia and is currently active in 13 countries of Africa; Uganda, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Kenya, Nigeria, Cameroon, Ghana, Zambia, South Africa, Benin, Malawi, Namibia and Sudan. The organization has benefited from support by Capacity Building International (InWEnt) of Germany since its inception and has its International secretariate at International Centre North South Dialogue (ICND) – Germany.
NECOFA is committed to empowering communities to rediscover themselves and their rich social-cultural and agro-ecological heritage. It endeavors to scale up and out positive values of sustainable development that is based on minimum external inputs and that enhances the communities pride, dignity and confidence. This model of sustainable development puts man (and woman) at centre, respects biodiversity and lays strong foundation for the youth and future generations.
NECOFA VISION: To have efficient, profitable and ecologically sustainable
agriculture systems in Africa
NECOFA MISSION: To enhance community livelihoods through sustainable
ecological farming:
Objectives of NECOFA:
In NEOFA we believe that to achieve sustainable development it is important to invest and integrate the youth in development initiatives and activities.
Agriculture employs over 60% of the Kenyan people and contributes about 70% to the G.D.P and yet it is not given sufficient emphasis in school curriculum. About two-thirds of primary and secondary school youth drop out of school and go back to the rural areas unprepared for a career as small-scale farmers. Many of them immigrate to urban centers in search of employment thereby worsening the already bad unemployment situation. Many of them end up in crime and irresponsible social life that has led to an erosion of morality and HIV/AIDS. Those that remain in the rural areas practice poor management of the land and indulge in the destruction of natural resources and the environment, especially by cutting down trees for fuel (for sale in urban centers) in attempt to get “quick” income.
Since early in 2006, the Network for Ecofarming in Africa (NECOFA) and the Slow Food Central Rift Convivium initiated a pilot project on school gardens in two primary schools in the Molo district. The schools are Michinda boys boarding primary school and Mukinyai primary school. Michinda is boys’ only primary school with pupils with ages ranging between 6 and 14 years. Mukinyai is a mixed school (boys and girls) serving a community faced by many financial difficulties and the pupils include several orphaned children, including by HIV/AIDS.
In each there is a school garden in which the pupils gain hands-on experience in food production, environmental management and other crafts skills. They learn and practice ecologically sustainable organic farming. We are aware that many of these children will become farmers and therefore the experience they gain will form a basis for stable livelihood in their future. The project assists in marketing the products made by the pupils and therefore they are able to contribute (albeit in a small way) to their own upkeep and buying some basic schooling materials.
The project prepares the youth to become conscientious food producers and/or to have conscientious selection and consumption of quality food and to respect biodiversity and food producers.
The pupils lead community members in clean-up campaigns of homes, villages and urban centers. The school gardens are bulking (multiplication) for planting materials and learning (demonstration) centers for the community thereby building harmony and partnership between the schools and their immediate communities.
The school children are involved in teaching fellow students, teachers and parents thereby building confidence and leadership skills in the growing youth.
The project is founded on the 4-k club model in which the K’s represent Kiswahili words for:
x Kuungana – coming together
x Kufanya – to do (learning by doing)
x Kusaidia – helping or assisting
x Kenya – our mother land
The project has proved to be quite successful and the pupils are now learning skills on sharing/accessing information on the Internet; they have participated in several shows in the district in which they showcase their activities and achievements. This is a success story that we wish to replicate in other schools and districts. In each school the club has 50 members. The youth learn the philosophy of Slow Food whose pillars are “good,” “fair” and “clean” food ( please see attached photos).
3. Objective and Goals of the Project
To inculcate positive values on food, agriculture and the environment in the growing youth
Specific Objectives
x The youth are prepared for a future as small-scale farmers and food consumers conscious of quality in food and respect for biodiversity
x Providing hands – on learning experience in the youth
x The school gardens are learning/demonstration centre for sustainable organic farming and multiplication/bulking of planting materials and small livestock for the community
x The school gardens supplement the school feeding programme
x The youth sensitize and participate with the community in environmental cleanliness and management.
x Providing the youth with a platform for information access and sharing locally and internationally
Project Outputs
4-K club members and other members of the schools undergo different forms of trainings in schools and outside.
Training
The trainings include:
x Participatory skills demonstrations facilitated by NECOFA and other collaborators
x Demonstration organized and conducted by 4-k club members targeting other school children, teachers and parents
x Tours and exchange visits
x Participation in agricultural shows
Information Access and Sharing
The club members and indeed other interested pupils in target schools and even others have opportunity to access information and share with others locally and internationally. through
x Newsletter: The project publishes a quarterly newsletter that is circulated in primary and secondary schools in Molo and Kibwezi districts. Club members, teachers and other students are encouraged to generate articles for publication in this newsletter.
x Internet: Club members have one-week holiday camping during school holidays of April and August (twice a year) in Molo during which they learn more about food and are also be exposed to the use of Internet in information sharing and exchange.
Competitions
Every year the club members are asked and encouraged to participate in award winning competitions related to food, environment and community development. This takes the shape of written essays and art. Club members enter for competition individually, as groups or even entire club. Schools also compete especially in their contribution(s) to food and nutrition security and community development.
Participation in Environmental and Clean-Up Campaigns
In each school term the 4-k club members lead and participate with community members in cleaning up exercises and tree planting.
Guiding Principles in Project Implementation
NECOFA considers the principles below to be fundamental in ensuring that the project and its activities are effective and sustainable.
x Undertake activities that are easily replicated in other schools and at home.
x Emphasizes use of locally available materials
x Undertake activities that quickly become self sustaining.
x Cooperation with local and international organizations/institutions including government departments, cooperatives and NGO
x Understanding that the current generation is utilizing and managing natural resources and biodiversity on behalf of the youth and future generations.
x Knowledge that the values we learn when young persist-on even in adulthood and investing in the youth is investing in prosperity and sustainability.
CONCLUSSION
Considering our experience and the success achieved in the project, NECOFA wishes to replicate the project in other schools in the district and in other districts. We invite well-wishers to join us in this venture.
1Mukono Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute, National Agricultural Research Organisation, Uganda
2National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO), Uganda
<h3 style="text-align: center;" align="center">Abstract</h3>
A farmer contest was organised among 23 Farmer Research Groups (FRGs) during implementation of a pilot project on Integrated Rural Resource Management (IRRM) in Central Uganda. The FRGs were made up of 135 and 186 farmers from sub-counties of Kayonza and Wakisi, respectively. The major objective of the contest was to foster farmer innovativeness in water harvesting techniques, soil and water management and facilitate exchange of knowledge and information among farmers. During planning, key stakeholders (farmers, NGOs, opinion leaders, extension agents and researchers) brainstormed to develop the contest theme, guidelines, criteria for judgment and prizes. The agreed theme was Sustainable Farming Practices and Innovations for optimum Productivity While Conserving the Natural Resource Base. Evaluation was at three levels. First, FRGs (most of which had 10-16 members) identified the best three farmers, using their own criteria. In phase two, sub-county Evaluation Committees were elected and sensitized to develop criteria to screen out the best 10 performing farmers from each of the sub-county. During phase three, the Project Contest Evaluation Committee (composed of all the stakeholder representatives) was instituted to make final contest judgment and award prizes. During the contest process innovations were identified and farmers showed that they could engage in productive agriculture using readily available resources. Given the innovativeness exhibited in soil and water management practices by participating farmers, it was evident that under proper guidance farmers can enhance sustainable agricultural production with minimum external inputs. The three-level evaluation of the contest facilitated exchange of knowledge, as farmers visited fields far from their areas of operation The final day of the contests attracted a cross section of the communities and enabled farmers and other stakeholders to exchange knowledge and learn from one another. The enthusiasm shown by the many observers including political leadership pointed to fact that contests can be a tool for enhancing farmer innovativeness in sustainable agricultural production, including organic farming. It was concluded that contests are an alternative avenue through which knowledge, farm practices and technologies can be shared among farmers.
Keywords: Evaluation, farming, management, soil, water
Contact Address: Peter Lusembo, Mukono Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute, National Agricultural Research Organisation, Kampala, Uganda,
Oromiya Agricultural Research Institute (OARI), Bako Agricultural Research Center, Agronomy and Crop Physiology, Ethiopia
<h3 style="text-align: center;" align="center">Abstract</h3>In the Horro highlands, wheat cultivation with conventional tillage and N-P fertiliser application on fields that had previously other crops, is the common system for smallholder farmers. In this area, the effects of conventional and minimum tillage, the previous crops and the rate of N-P fertiliser on wheat yield have not previously been tested. A trial was conducted to compare the effects of tillage system, previous crops and N-P fertiliser rate on wheat yield. Two-tillage systems (minimum and conventional tillage), three-previous crops (Niger seed, faba bean and barley) and two N-P rates (75 and 100% of the recommended fertiliser rate) were tested and compared with continuous wheat for both tillage systems in three replications.
Tillage system, previous crop and N-P fertiliser rate significantly influenced wheat grain and straw yield. Minimum tillage gave higher grain and straw yield. Wheat following Niger seed, gave higher grain and straw yield, followed by faba bean and barley as compared to continuous wheat. Highest wheat grain and straw yield were obtained from with minimum tillage, following Niger seed and faba bean with the recommended N-P fertiliser rate. Niger seed and faba bean were the best precursor crop for wheat production in the region. Application of recommended rate of fertilisers following previous crops was necessary for wheat production. Thus integrated use of these factors have the potential to increase wheat grain yield in Horro highlands.
Keywords: Cropping sequence, fertiliser rate, tillage system
Characterization and Evaluation of Some Soils Represent the most Potential Irrigable bare lands of White Nile of Sudan
Abdalla Elhagwa1 ; Christian Richter2.
1Agricultural Research Corporation, ARC, Wad Medani, Sudan.
2Institute of Crop Science, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, University ofKassel
Abstract
The present study is on soil characterization and land evaluation of soils that are irrigable from White Nile and may contribute significantly in the improvement of agricultural production of these poor areas. The total area is about 65000 ha.
Soil characterization and land evaluation processes were done following the international standards that adapted to the local conditions.
Ten soil profiles and more than 5000 soil samples were analyzed to characterize the established soils and to study the salinity and sodicity distribution in the area.
Six soil types were identified as to their variability in their landscape positions, soil texture, soil reaction and vertisolic characteristics. Four out of six soil types of the area are Vertisols and the other two are Arid sols.
The current land suitability for irrigated agriculture of the identified land units .ranges from moderately suitable (56.1 % of the total area) to 43.9 % as marginally suitable lands.
The predominant limitations for irrigated agriculture are mostly related to their high content of smectetic clays (vertisolic limitations), water soluble salts and exchangeable sodium.
The study of salts distribution revealed that the soluble salts are concentrated mainly on the top 30 cm of the soil profile and this comprises to more than 50% of the total area. The salinity classes identified in the area are mainly slightly to moderately saline. High content of salts (strongly saline classes) are of a limited extent and mostly associated with depressional sites.
Sodic soils (slightly to strongly) of 0 to 30 cm soil depth occupy about 30.4 % of the total area. However, sodicity increases with depth to account for 32 .4% of the total area.
In general, the strongly saline and strongly sodic soils are limited in their aerial extent for the three studied depths vis : 1% and 5 % of the total area for strongly saline and strongly sodic respectively.
Keywords: Soils of Sudan, land evaluation, soil classification, salinity and sodicity distribution.
<h2 style="text-align: center;" align="center">Organic Coffee Production and Sustainable Agriculture: A Socio-Ecological Analysis</h2> <h3 style="text-align: center;" align="center">Asfaw Tihune1, Sahle Tesfai2</h3>
1NECOFA-Ethiopia, Ethiopia
2International Centre North South Dialogue (ICNSD), NECOFA International, Germany
<h3 style="text-align: center;" align="center">Abstract</h3>
Coffee used to be the main agricultural commodity of Ethiopia for long period. The last thirty years have experienced repeated fall in price at the global market. This has affected the country's foreign exchange earnings in general and smallholder producers in particular. Moreover, the repeated price fall has negatively impacted the livelihood of about 25 % of the country's populations who directly or indirectly depend on coffee industry. This makes it recommendable for the country to search for another alternative means of being competitive. Oromiyaa Coffee Farmers Cooperative Union Ltd. is engaged in the production and marketing of Organic and Fair-trade coffee since the last four years.
This case study is conducted at Limmuu Koossaa District. Three coffee producing sites were selected. Each site is sampled with characteristic attributes relevant to organic coffee production, cooperative membership, non-organic coffee production and non-cooperative membership.
The study employed a socio-ecological analysis of organic coffee production in contrast to non-organic way of coffee production. The impacts of these components on environmental sustainability, optimal production and equity are measured. The study utilised both primary and secondary data. The indicators for these performances were identified as the state of resources and the management efficiencies of these resources in each sample site. A series of variables are identified for investigation under each indicator, whose impacts on environmental sustainability, productivity or equity are evaluated in each site.
The study disclosed that organic coffee production is ecologically sound and economically rewarding when compared to non-organic way of coffee production Social and institutional performances, as examined for transparency and benefit sharing of primary producers, of the system of production in the study area are found to be as poor as in non-organic system of production. The results show that organic coffee production, as implemented in Baabboo, did not attain social justice and equity. It has not yet attained a ‘break-away' from similar constrains of non-organic system of production.
The study concludes that sustainability of organic coffee production at Baabboo is confronted with potential dangers. The study, thus, provides signals of policy implications of the challenges and opportunities of organics.
Keywords: Socio-ecological analysis, Ethiopia, organic coffee
Towards an establishment of a task team and development of milestones for the formation of a provincial farmers’ forum for organic farming in Limpopo
Held at Tompi Seleka Centre of Excellence
8th – 9th March 2007
Compiled by: Mphahlele M
The Limpopo Department of Agriculture (LDA) together with NECOFA (Network for Ecofarming in Africa) initiated a market – driven organic production and farmer controlled enterprise with the purpose of enhancing the development of organized groups of smallholder farmers and farmer organizations. This partnership was officialised in the form of an MOU established and singed between LDA and NECOFA in June 2005. The implementation of organic farming initiative has so far been driven by the officers from LDA and NECOFA with farmers taking the back set. Since June 2007, the organizational development process had focused on the strengthening of the farmer organization in the pilots. At the present moment, most of the six pilot projects have established their executive committee that manages the affairs at project level.
This report documents the proceedings of a workshop that attempted to facilitate the establishment of the task team that would drive the process of forming the provincial forum of organic farmers in Limpopo. The workshop took place during the 8th – 9th March 2007 and was held at Tompi Seleka College of Excellence. The workshop was attended by farmers’ executive committees from the six pilot projects and LDA officials composed of extension officers and scientist implementing the “Market Lead Organic Farming”.
This documented proceeding is not a synthesized report, but tried to capture the outputs of the workshop in a direct and non-interpreted manner. It can serve as a basis for shaping future submissions. THE DOCUMENTATION IS MEANT TO BE A REFERENCE DOCUMENT for all participants and management of LDA and NECOFA.
Popular song of the workshop ….
……”Re leetong la organic, tsamaya le rona ntate warona” ………..
Day 1 program 08/03/2007
Program director: M. Lebona
|
Session |
Activity |
|
8:30-10:30
|
|
|
T E A |
B R E A K |
|
11:00-13:00 |
|
|
L U N C H |
B R E A K |
|
14:00-15:30 |
|
|
T E A |
B R E A K |
|
16:00-17:00 |
|
<h1 style="margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;">1. Opening</h1>
The workshop was opened with a prayer by one farmer from Letlapapula Mr. France Molefe.
<h1>2. Welcome </h1>
P. Komane gave words of welcome. He welcomed everyone and noted that we are here to work together, share ideas and learn from each other. He concluded by saying “Unity is the power”.
<h1>3. Introduction and expectations </h1>
Task
Divide yourself into your pilots.
Tell us who you are
Where are you coming from
What do you do at your pilot
Come up with a symbol that represent your pilot and why the symbol.
Choose your subscriber and presenter.
1. Ikageng Ga-Masha cooperative
|
Who are we
|
Where do we come from |
what we do
|
Our symbol and why
|
|
Eva Masha Gloria Moswane Martha Nchabeleng Selina Moswane |
Ga- Sekhukhune |
We plant vegetables, try beans and maize |
Sweet potato Because it is easy to plant and there is no hard working |
2. MTN
|
Who are we
|
Where do we come from |
what we do
|
Our symbol and why
|
|
Lillian Mosoma Jeffrey Sethole Johannes Molobela Ike Pebane Abisie Moripa |
Bohlabela district |
We farming poultry production and vegetable productions |
Cup? As we are still growing, we believe we going to grow bigger and strong as well as responsible |
3. Maboi 3
|
Who are we
|
Where do we come from |
what we do
|
Our symbol and why
|
|
Jack Mojapelo Elias Chuene Maria Letsoalo Lydia Mothapo |
Maboi Capricorn |
We farm butternuts, beans and beetroots Making compost Pasture trials Cattle |
Elephant We have a big farm and we always persevere no matter what problems |
4. Lambani
|
Who are we
|
Where do we come from |
what we do
|
Our symbol and why
|
|
Mr. Mudzanani Mr. Siphuma Mr. Rambuda Mrs Munyai Mrs Rambuda |
Vhembe district |
We farm vegetables |
Cow It produces so many things |
4. Letlapapula
|
Who are we
|
Where do we come from |
what we do
|
Our symbol and why
|
|
Ludwick Madiope France Molefe |
Waterberg district |
|
Rock No matter what happens we always stay unshaken and strong |
5. LDA and NECOFA
|
Who are we
|
Where do we come from |
what we do
|
Our symbol and why
|
|
Chuene Richard Malatji Adolph Morutse Mantsi Masola S Laubisi H.J Mphephu M Ramaru M.J Lebona M. Mello M. Komane P. Mphahlele M. |
Head office Tompi Seleka Waterberg Polokwane Vhembe Sekhukhune Lepelle Nkumpi Bohlabela NECOFA |
We assist in the implementations of organic farming |
Fire We have initiated organic farming which touches the hearts of many including politicians
|
Summary of expectations
Learn from other farmers
Get more training on organic farming
Learn how to do things on our own
Collect more information regarding organic farming
Through this workshop MTN will gain strength
Farmers must start to take a lead in this farming
4. Objective of the workshop
Presented by Mr. J. Ramaru - LDA
Farmers to have a better understanding of the market orientated organic farming
Farmers share their progress for the implementation of organic farming initiative
Farmers justify the need for a provincial structure
Farmer explore different options/forms for collective action (intermediate and future)
Farmers define the tasks/functions for interim task team
Farmers identify criteria for the election of people in the interim task team
Immediate next steps/tasks for the task team
5. Program overview
<h1>Presented by Mr. J. Ramaru- LDA</h1>
He explained the 1st day as well as 2nd day program as a whole, each item individually.

<h1> </h1>
<h1>6. Committee establishment and ground rules</h1>
Presented by Mr. R. Chuene - LDA and Mr. A. Malatji – Tompi seleka
o They explained the tasks of all the three different committees
o The time keeper tells us when to start, when time is up and generally ensures that we work on time
o The welfare committee attends to complains regarding food, accommodation and cleanness.
o The reflection committee will meet with the steering committee at the end and evaluate work done for the day.
Time keeper
Welfare committee
<h1> Reflection team</h1>
Ground rules
<h1>7. Overview of the Market – Lead Organic Farming – where do we come from? </h1>
Presented by P. Komane - NECOFA
Background report 2006-8
Partnership
MOU
Exposure
Planning workshop
Annual work plan 2006/7
OD- partnership building
Institutionalizing organic
Annual work plan 2007/8
LDA – NECOFA framework of working together

<h1>8. Progress from the pilot in organic farming </h1>
Presented by Mr. Morutse – Letlapapula
Task
Form project groups
Reflect on the progress that you made so far in organic farming in the following manner:
|
What we have achieved |
How did we do it? |
Where are we still weak |
Why are we weak? |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Letlapapula
|
What we have achieved |
How did we do it? |
Where are we still weak |
Why are we weak? |
|
Tentative production
|
LDA and Letlapapula MAG |
Pest control |
Farmers next to us are using chemicals |
|
compost making |
Training at Mazivhandlela |
Disease control |
Lack of sunlight because of shade |
|
Structure of committee |
LDA and NECOFA |
Low production |
Pests and diseases |
|
Mentor |
LDA and NECOFA |
|
|
|
Changing of irrigation system |
LDA and NECOFA |
|
|
|
Soil samples |
LDA |
|
|
|
Identifying of 3ha |
LDA and NECOFA |
|
|
2. Ikageng co-operation
|
What we have achieved |
How did we do it? |
Where are we still weak |
Why are we weak? |
|
3ha for organic 10ha for livestock |
Asked land from the chief |
Compost making |
Did not have material |
|
Fencing |
Done that with our hands |
Delays |
From officers |
|
Constitution Established committee |
Help form ext. officers |
|
|
|
Collected cow dung and grass for compost |
Did that on our own |
|
|
|
We have water |
Did that on our own |
|
|
|
Bought drilling machine |
With our own money |
|
|
3. Lambani
|
What we have achieved |
How did we do it? |
Where are we still weak |
Why are we weak? |
|
Election of committee |
Farmers |
Fencing Road Irrigation equipments |
Made inquiries to the ward councilor |
|
Formation of portfolio committee i.e production marketing compost making financial infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
Compost material |
Farmers |
|
|
|
Redrafting of constitution |
Committee |
|
|
4. Maboi 3
|
What we have achieved |
How did we do it? |
Where are we still weak |
Why are we weak? |
|
Election of committee Elected leaders according to different functions |
Help from ext. officers |
Lack of enough compost |
Still arranging with to get material |
|
Trained in compost making |
Ext officers and Tompi seleka |
Still good knowledge in organic |
We still need training |
|
Drafted constitution |
Help from ext. officers |
|
|
|
Done our work plan |
Ext. officers |
|
|
5. MTN project
|
What we have achieved |
How did we do it? |
Where are we still weak |
Why are we weak? |
|
Constitution |
Committee and ext. officers |
Compost heaps |
Lacked information on when to start making compost |
|
Sub-committees |
Committee |
|
|
|
We are united |
Through sharing information |
|
|
|
Security |
Collaboration with Bohlabela district |
|
|
|
Collected compost material |
On our own |
|
|
|
2ha organic land |
|
|
|
9. Unpacking collective action for provincial level
Facilitated by E. Mphephu
Task
Form buzz group, discuss and come up with:
° Advantages of collective action at provincial level
° Disadvantages of collective action at provincial level
and they came up with the following advantages and disadvantages:
Summary of advantages
This will help us get a market for our produces
Will help us in asking for funds from other countries
We will be able to share ideas
Collaboration with service providers
We will be approach government collectively
We will have one vision that will be understandable to government and others
This will help us increase our production
We will together fight diseases that attacks our plants
We will be to put ourselves on the map
Will also help our projects to sustain
Will help us to look after our nature and soil so that our children will in future also benefit from them.
Will create organic farming awareness to our people.
Summary of disadvantages
We are scattered from all different areas
We won’t to be able to meet regularly
We need money for our task team to be able to meet
10. Options/forms for collective actions
Facilitated by J. Ramaru
The farmers discussed in the buzz groups the question of “is there a need for a provincial forum” and the answers were positive from all groups.
What is possible in the future?
o we need to organized as a provincial farmers organisation dealing with organic farming
What is possible in the interim – now?
o answer from farmers: we need to establish a task team
Attendance register 08/2007
|
Name & surname |
District |
Responsibilities |
Contacts |
|
1. France Molefe |
Waterberg |
Farmer |
083 6828394 |
|
2. Ludwick Madiope |
Waterberg |
Farmer |
078 557 7289 |
|
3. Mantsi Morutse |
Waterberg |
Coordinator |
073 318 7895 |
|
4. Joe Ramaru |
Head office |
Project manager |
082 449 8025 |
|
5. Lebona A.M |
Capricorn |
Deputy P. manager |
082 803 8051 |
|
6. Rambuda T. E |
Vhembe |
Farmer |
073 033 872 |
|
7. Maria Letsoalo |
Capricorn |
Farmers |
076 93 8909 |
|
8. Munyai M.S |
Vhembe |
Farmer |
073 318 7124 |
|
9. Rambuda M. |
Vhembe |
Farmer |
|
|
10.Eva Masha |
Ikageng |
Farmer |
072 685 6189 |
|
11. Lilian Mosona |
Bohlabela |
farmer |
082 700 5097 |
|
12. Gloria Moswane |
Sekhukhune |
Farmer |
072 495 1130 |
|
13. Peter Komane |
Waterberg |
Coordinator |
015 491 3560 |
|
14. Selina Moswane |
Ikageng |
Farmer |
|
|
15. Johannes Molobela |
Bohlabela |
Farmer |
073 2721 669 |
|
16. Ndwakhulu S. |
Vhembe |
Farmer |
079 537 7712 |
|
17. Martha Nchabeleng |
Ikageng |
Farmer |
|
|
18. Lydia Mothapo |
Maboi |
Farmer |
072 492 4831 |
|
19. Ubisi H.J |
Bohlabela |
Technician |
082 576 1571 |
|
20. Maake L.P |
Mopani |
Crop scientist |
082 805 8911 |
|
21. Mayimele G.E |
Mopani |
Facilitator |
083 7346 717 |
|
22. Masola S.L |
Capricorn |
Facilitator |
082 663 5037 |
|
23. Mello K.M |
Sekhukhune |
Crop production |
072 5383 810 |
|
24. Mphephu M.E |
Vhembe |
Facilitator |
072 274 7807 |
|
25. Mudzanani |
Vhembe |
Farmer |
073 234 6847 |
|
26. Jack Mojapelo |
Maboi |
Farmer |
076 857 0354 |
|
27. Martha Rampa |
Maboi |
Farmer |
072 846 3384 |
|
28. Abisi Moripa |
Bohlabela |
Farmer |
072 2959840 |
|
29. Chuene R.S |
Head office |
Reseacher |
078 586 6244 |
|
30.Ike Pebane |
Capricorn |
Maboi |
|
|
31. Jeffrey Sithole |
Bohlabela |
Farmer |
079 5 4935 |
|
32. Adolph Malatji |
Tompi seleka |
Soil scientist |
072 648 6889 |
|
33. Maria Mphahlele |
Waterberg |
Administrator |
|
|
34. Dikgole W.N |
Sekhukhune |
Agriculture |
072 750 0240 |
|
35. Moraswi N.E |
Sekhukhune |
Farmer |
072 495 1130 |
|
36. Mamanyuha L. |
Vhembe |
Scientist |
072 44 0834 |
Day 2 Program 09/03/2007
Program director: Lebona M.
|
Session |
|
|
8:00-10:30 |
|
|
T E A |
B R E A K |
|
11:00-13:30 |
|
1. Opening
The Workshop was opened with a worship song and a prayer by Mrs. Moraswi
2. Committee reports
All different committees presented in the following manner:
Welfare committee
Presented by France Molefe – Letlapapula farmers
Everything was reported fine and of satisfactory because there no complains.

Reflection team
Presented by Johannes Molobela – MTN farmers
Lydia Mothapo - Maboi 3
What went well?
Started in time
Full participation by farmers
Time management was good
Facilitation was excellent
Concept was well presented and understood by farmers
Farmers were confident when presenting
Energized in a form of songs, slogans brought life to the workshop
Farmers learned and were sharing from each other
Introduction was done very well and helped to reduce the tension
What went wrong?
Gave small background about each pilot project
Some presenters were facing and showed their back to the participants
We still did not have farmers from Nkomamonta
Officers from MTN were not available
3. Functions of the task team
Task
Form a buzz group of 3 people
Discuss about functions of the task team
Summary of the functions of a task team
Our task team must be able to get us information and service from the government and others
Must be able to come up with a work plan
Must make sure that all needs are provided
They must also be able to take care of all pilots and ensure that they work successfully
They must be able to give guidance if and when needed
They must be able to take proper decisions for the farmers when there is a need
Ensure that meetings are held regularly
Must be able to mobilize organic farming
See to it that organic farmers are organized
To be able to establish a ruling committee for organic farmers
Must be able to work not only for themselves but for all organic farmers
Must be able to engage in fundraising for benefits of the farmers
Ensure that organic farming is done properly at all pilots
They must come up with a constitution, decide what form of organization they want to be (e,g cooperative ect.) and ensure that their organization end up registered.
Organize training for farmers
Be able to collaborate with other organic farmers from within our province, other provinces and from other countries.
4. Criteria for election of task team members
Task
Form a buzz group, discuss and come up with criteria for election of task team members.
Who do we want to form part of our task team?
Someone that has patience, dedication and a vision
Must be a hard worker
Must know what is expected of them
Must be punctual
Must not be a person with pride
Someone who always reports back to other farmers
Must have love for people and his work
Must account for his work
Must be multilingual
Must be able to stand in front of people confidently
Must be respectful
Be able to read and write
Must never have been convicted of any crime ( undergoing a court case)
A person who does not steal
Must be hyperactive
A person who is keen to learn
Must have interest and love for organic farming
Someone with compassion
5. Election of a task team
How do we elect our task team? The farmers agreed as follows:
Elect amongst ourselves as different pilot projects
Elect two from each pilot project
The farmers grouped themselves according to their projects and elected the following as the task team:
Rambuda T.E
Siphuma N.J
France Molefe
Ludwick Madiope
Mojaple J.L
Letsoalo N.M
Moraswi M.E
Nchabeleng M.M
Mosoma L.M
Molobela J.P
Positions
Chairperson
Vice-chairperson
Secretary
Vice-secretary
Treasure
Additional members
How do we position our elected members?
Elect amongst themselves
Each five positions must have a pilot member
Gender consideration
The elected members grouped and positioned themselves as follows:
Chairperson
Molefe F.M
Vice-chairperson
Moraswi N.E
Secretary
Letsoalo N.M
Vice-secretary
Molobela J.P
Treasure
Rambuda T.E
Additional members
Mosoma L.M
Siphuma N.J
Nchabeleng M.M
Madiope L.S
Mojapelo J.L
Words from the Chairperson
He thanked all members of the task team for putting their trust on him and everyone present. He said that he is rest assured his fellow farmers are to work towards the benefits of everyone not himself. In his closing statement he said “Let us now take the lead in organic farming”.
6. Next steps
Preparation of the conference 11-12/04/2007 ( it will be done with other farmers)
Task team arrive on the 9th April 2007
Development of work plan by task team on the 10/04/2007 (development of budget)
Workshop report. Ramaru to forward the report to all the municipalities by 16/03/2007
Feedback to the projects by the representatives by the 23/03/07
7. Workshop evaluation
|
Activities |
Good |
Fair |
Bad |
|
Facilitation |
20 |
5 |
|
|
Participation |
19 |
5 |
|
|
Group discussion |
20 |
1 |
|
|
Formation of the task team |
17 |
5 |
|
|
Menu |
15 |
8 |
|
|
Accommodation |
12 |
8 |
4 |
8. Vote of thanks
By Letsoalo N.M
She on behalf of the farmers thanked the facilitators importantly Mr. J Ramaru and Lebona M. for their dedication and hard work.
9. Closure
The workshop was closed with a prayer by Mr. Maake L.P
Attendances register 09/03/2007
|
Name & surname |
District |
Responsibilities |
Contacts |
|
1. France Molefe |
Waterberg |
Farmer |
083 6828394 |
|
2. Ludwick Madiope |
Waterberg |
Farmer |
078 557 7289 |
|
3. Mantsi Morutse |
Waterberg |
Coordinator |
073 318 7895 |
|
4. Joe Ramaru |
Head office |
Project manager |
082 449 8025 |
|
5. Lebona A.M |
Capricorn |
Deputy P. manager |
082 803 8051 |
|
6. Rambuda T. E |
Vhembe |
Farmer |
073 033 872 |
|
7. Maria Letsoalo |
Capricorn |
Farmers |
076 93 8909 |
|
8. Munyai M.S |
Vhembe |
Farmer |
073 318 7124 |
|
9. Rambuda M. |
Vhembe |
Farmer |
|
|
10.Eva Masha |
Ikageng |
Farmer |
072 685 6189 |
|
11. Lilian Mosona |
Bohlabela |
farmer |
082 700 5097 |
|
12. Gloria Moswane |
Sekhukhune |
Farmer |
072 495 1130 |
|
13. Peter Komane |
Waterberg |
Coordinator |
015 491 3560 |
|
14. Selina Moswane |
Ikageng |
Farmer |
|
|
15. Johannes Molobela |
Bohlabela |
Farmer |
073 2721 669 |
|
16. Ndwakhulu S. |
Vhembe |
Farmer |
079 537 7712 |
|
17. Martha Nchabeleng |
Ikageng |
Farmer |
|
|
18. Lydia Mothapo |
Maboi |
Farmer |
072 492 4831 |
|
19. Ubisi H.J |
Bohlabela |
Technician |
082 576 1571 |
|
20. Maake L.P |
Mopani |
Crop scientist |
082 805 8911 |
|
21. Mayimele G.E |
Mopani |
Facilitator |
083 7346 717 |
|
22. Masola S.L |
Capricorn |
Facilitator |
082 663 5037 |
|
23. Mello K.M |
Sekhukhune |
Crop production |
072 5383 810 |
|
24. Mphephu M.E |
Vhembe |
Facilitator |
072 274 7807 |
|
25. Mudzanani |
Vhembe |
Farmer |
073 234 6847 |
|
26. Jack Mojapelo |
Maboi |
Farmer |
076 857 0354 |
|
27. Martha Rampa |
Maboi |
Farmer |
072 846 3384 |
|
28. Abisi Moripa |
Bohlabela |
Farmer |
072 2959840 |
|
29. Chuene R.S |
Head office |
Reseacher |
078 586 6244 |
|
30.Ike Pebane |
Capricorn |
Maboi |
|
|
31. Jeffrey Sithole |
Bohlabela |
Farmer |
079 5 4935 |
|
32. Adolph Malatji |
Tompi seleka |
Soil scientist |
072 648 6889 |
|
33. Maria Mphahlele |
Waterberg |
Administrator |
|
|
34. Dikgole W.N |
Sekhukhune |
Agriculture |
072 750 0240 |
|
35. Moraswi N.E |
Sekhukhune |
Farmer |
072 495 1130 |
|
36. Mamanyuha L. |
Vhembe |
Scientist |
072 44 0834 |
|
37. Mojapelo E |
Capricorn |
Ext. officer |
082 941 6128 |

<h1>Biowatch South Africa Costs Appeal: Chronology of Events</h1>
1997
First GM crops are commercially released in South Africa.
December 1999
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) Act comes into operation.
<h1>July 2000</h1>
Biowatch South Africa makes first request for information about how permitting decisions for GM crops are made. The organisation makes further requests on another three occasions up to February 2001 but receives inadequate responses from the Registrar. The information requested included:
<h1>August 2002</h1>
Biowatch South Africa serves court papers on the Department of Agriculture, naming the Registrar for Genetic Resources, the Executive Council for Genetic Resources and the Minister of Agriculture as respondents.
<h1>February 2003</h1>
Monsanto South Africa (Pty) Ltd applies to join the court proceedings as a co-respondent, on the grounds that they have a direct and substantial interest in the subject matter of the proceedings. Two other companies – Stoneville Pedigreed and Delta and Pine Land - which distribute Monsanto GM seed also apply to join the proceedings as co-respondents, opposing Biowatch South Africa’s application. The Open Democracy Advice Centre joins proceedings as a friend of the court to advance arguments in support of Biowatch South Africa’s constitutional right of access to information.
<h1>May 2004</h1>
The case for access to information is heard in the Pretoria High Court.
<h1>February 24 2005</h1>
Acting Judge Eric Dunn hands down his order.
<h1> </h1>
<h1>June 23 2005</h1>
Biowatch is granted leave to appeal the costs order.
<h2>13 October 2006</h2>
Biowatch is informed that 23 April 2007 is the date on which the court will hear the appeal.
Biowatch South Africa’s appeal against court costs order
On Monday, 23 April 2007, a full bench will hear Biowatch South Africa’s appeal against a court order that it pays Monsanto South Africa legal costs.
The Legal Resources Centre is acting on Biowatch South Africa’s behalf in the appeal.
The costs order being appealed arose out of Biowatch South Africa’s successful application to the Pretoria High Court for the South African Department of Agriculture to provide access to information about how decisions are made in the permitting of genetically modified crops in South Africa.
Monsanto South Africa (Pty) Ltd joined these court proceedings to oppose Biowatch South Africa’s application against the South African Department of Agriculture. Monsanto South Africa (Pty) Ltd said it joined the court proceedings because it had to protect confidential information. Biowatch South Africa has always maintained that it does not require the release of information protected in law as confidential.
In February 2005 acting Judge Eric Dunn ordered that Biowatch South Africa be granted access to almost all the information it had requested. Judge Dunn reaffirmed that:
Judge Dunn also said that:
However, instead of applying the general principle that costs should follow the outcome of litigation, Judge Dunn ordered Biowatch South Africa to pay the legal costs of Monsanto South Africa (Pty) Ltd.
Biowatch South Africa is appealing the costs order for the following main reasons:
Monsanto South Africa (Pty) Ltd was the only respondent to insist, right to the end, that Biowatch South Africa should pay its legal costs.
Biowatch South Africa is a national non-profit organisation which was established in 1997 to publicise, monitor and research issues of genetic modification and to promote biological diversity, biosafety, food security and social justice. The organisation has its head office in Cape Town and offices in KwaZulu Natal and Limpopo provinces. It relies on donor funds to carry out its work.
| About Necofa | General Acitivities | Projects | National Network Groups | Picture Gallery | Services | Contact & Imprint |
